|
|
|
|
Holistic Guidance - Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon
|
List Price: $16.00
Our Price: $10.40
Your Save: $ 5.60 ( 35% )
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Manufacturer: Penguin (Non-Classics)
|
Average Customer Rating:   
|
|
Binding: Paperback
Dewey Decimal Number: 210
EAN: 9780143038337
ISBN: 0143038338
Label: Penguin (Non-Classics)
Manufacturer: Penguin (Non-Classics)
Number Of Items: 1
Number Of Pages: 464
Publication Date: 2007-02-06
Publisher: Penguin (Non-Classics)
Studio: Penguin (Non-Classics)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
For all the thousands of books that have been written about religion, few until this one have attempted to examine it scientifically: to ask why—and how—it has shaped so many lives so strongly. Is religion a product of blind evolutionary instinct or rational choice? Is it truly the best way to live a moral life? Ranging through biology, history, and psychology, Daniel C. Dennett charts religion’s evolution from "wild" folk belief to "domesticated" dogma. Not an antireligious screed but an unblinking look beneath the veil of orthodoxy, Breaking the Spell will be read and debated by believers and skeptics alike.
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Interesting Book and Telling Reviews
Comment: Daniel Dennett in his book "Breaking the Spell" breaks with most of his atheist colleagues, leaving behind the "shock and awe" approach of Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens, but tries to draw in both believers and non-believers for a tame, rational discussion about religion and other superstititions and how they evolved. Dennett, admits that he is speculating on several counts, and but seems to ask the question, "can we even have this discussion?"
The Title "Breaking the Spell" is intended as a proposal to break the taboo we have in our society about discussing religion rationally from a scientific perspective. Dennett proceeds, naively I think, to discuss various scientific explanations for religion and discusses their qualities and drawbacks.
Though the book is very thoughtful and full of many insights, I think most true-believers will treat the book as a sort of "trojan horse" to allow rational discussion about irrational superstititions. I don't know how many of Dennett's target audience will ultimately ask to drop the drawbridge and accept Dennett's offer.
Feeling protected by their fortress of faith and supported by the mutual delusion of the other soldiers manning the fort, true-believers will probably feel they can endure the artillery assault of reason leveled by Dawkins and Hitchens as well as deal with Harris's efforts to mine their foundation. I doubt the book will go anywhere within the religious community. However it creates an interesting starting point for those who do wish to discuss religion as a natural phenomenom and to understand it. Like Michael Shermer's "Why We Believe", it will probably go down as an insightful glimpse into religion, but won't accomplish it's desired objective. Many of the reviews sort of bear that out (notwithstanding the number of Christian knuckleheads who found this book associated with Dawkin's and Harris's books and immediately attacked it without reading it).
Even so, I highly recommend this book.
Customer Rating:
Summary: The Underlying Theme is Policy and Politics
Comment: This is the first book that I have read by Mr. Dennett and let me say at the outset that I am thankful that there are authors like him that are willing to take the time to "circle" a subject and view it from several different scientific, sociological and anthropological perspectives. This book is not a harsh criticism of religion but an attempt, as I understand it, to foster a dialogue in order to determine what policies, if any, should be carried out in the future to curb potential threats from religious fanatics. I for one do not wish to live under a theocracy; I do not want to be told what to think - so here is where I must voice my concern regarding Mr. Dennett's references to making "policy" decisions: someone other than the individual or family would be making the call - making a value judgment for them. What is harmful, what is good and what is bad with regards to religion would all be decided by others. Policies and laws already exist - harmful behaviors have consequences. Where would the new "policies" end? Religion is not what I would call a "natural phenomenon" but only one of the many behavioral traits of the natural phenomenon known as the human animal. As I see it, the human mind is the last refuge - the place where one can dream and reflect, pray or meditate without outside interference - I think this is why there is such a reluctance by many (as Mr. Dennett notes)to even begin to try to understand why people believe what they believe.
Customer Rating:
Summary: A great treat from Dennett
Comment: This is a superb book about religion from Dennett, who has attained a renown as a philosopher of mind and cognitive science. He brings the tools from those disciplines to the subject of religion; in particular, he makes use of the concept of the "intentional stance" that we naturally take towards objects, both animate and inanimate. Dennett's book is a part of the very recent trend to scrutinize religion by conceptual tools taken from cognitive psychology, anthropology and evolutionary biology -- as a natural phenomnon like any other. This is in keeping with an argument from Dennett's earlier book, DARWIN'S DANGEROUS IDEA, to the effect that Darwin's idea of natural selection is a "universal acid". That is to say, the idea of natural selection is no narrow scientific concept, but a general scientific approach that is applicable "all the way up" as well as "all the way down". There is no area of research that could be immune to it. Hence, this approach must be applicable to the putatively "sacred" subject of religion as well.
A note on Dennett's target audience: Dennett hopes his books will be read, among others, by non-fanatical Christians, whom he would like to convince that a naturalistic study of religion need not necessarily rob religion of its charm. In other words, the spell need not necessarily be broken, or rather, we will not know until we will have done our homework. Two remarks. First, I believe Dennett is actually pretty sure that the spell will be broken. Second, I think he hopes in vain that many of his Christian co-patriots are going to bother with his book. BREAKING THE SPELL is going to be read primarily by secular academics like me, so Dennett is preaching to the converted.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Science as an Incantation
Comment: Dennett talks up science here but there is little evidence that cognitive psychology provides a basis for a scientific investigation of religion. Cognitive psychology (as opposed to cognitive neuroscience) has no stable results as of yet but the program Dennett advocates depends upon cognitive psychology providing a basis for theologically orientated research. Questioning the obscure via the obscure is hardly enlightening. Science here is used as an incantation rather than as providing a basis for a viable research program.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Is It 'Breaking' the Spell or 'Casting' the Spell? A Brilliant Cognitive Philosopher casts his net!
Comment: Professor Daniel C. Dennett is an international philosopher worthy of His Holiness, Benedict XVI dictum, "the philosopher was someone who knew how to teach the essential art: the art of being authentically human---the art of living and dying." [Encyclical Letter, SPE SALVI facti sumus ("In Hope we were saved", St. Paul, Romans 8:24)]
Previous reviewers have drawn attention to Professor Dennett's intentions, scope and achievements, what I want to do is start the process of treating 'religion' as an ideational or notional idea (forgive the impregnated tautology as rhetorical-psychological emphasis). It has a written history!
Since I am an ancient language scholar of Oriental (mainly Semitic) and Indo-European languages, I have a secure foundation in the development of religious sacred learning or 'scientific theology.' Here competence in Babylonian cuneiform, Egyptian Hieroglyphics, Old and Middle Persian, Classical Hebrew and Classical Greek are required. What does one learn when (s)he puts the dry philological details of these various grammatical systems, with their supporting legal, administrative and religious textual documents, in his head?
He learns religious learning is self-deception and communal hypocrisy! It is a cover for those human maniacs who inflict the gravest of wrongs upon their fellow man. It was a retreat by human monsters to the inner sanctuaries and temples of learning and instruction to find solace for their moral-legal crimes. Its by-product was useful information about calendars, planting seasons, growth of husbandry and crops, and physical & mental hygiene. But it also producted pernicious by-products such as divination, theurgy, mircle-mongering, begging priests, book-burning, etc.
The books of religion as a natural phenomenon have been written; they merely must be read! Start with Sir James Frazer, "The Golden Bough" (12 volumes)! Mankind evoluted in 'science' or knowledge [What the Latin term 'scientia' means] from animism > magic > religion > science > cosmic self-consciousness (modern cosmology-astronomy). This should serve as the great paradigm or archetype model.
You will discover along this path that there is much 'word magic' in religious writings. An example is modern authors using learned technical Babylonian terms, or Egyptian terms, or Graeco-Latin terms with no 'real' understanding of what these terms delimited or concretely meant. There is a great spiritual dryness and aridity to religious learning. Metaphor and Analogy add an appropriate amount of eager 'wetness' to these mundane discussions (no pun intended).
Presently, Oxford University, Oxford, England just received a $13 Million Dollar grant to study the origin of deity in global human ancient, historical culture. I have just laid out what must be its preamble or harenga. The Oxonian Senior Researchers will learn that any and all religions oscillate between repressive tolerance or intolerance & aggressiveness. Its purpose is to keep the majority mentally ignorant, so they live miserable lives---while teaching them there is a wonderful 'abode of bliss' waiting for them on the otherside of the curtain of Death!
See my Review on Dr. Sam Harris' book, "End of Faith" about the role of "cabbage heads" to maintain the absurdities of religion under the dupery of revelations, creeds and doctrinal nonsense.
It should be remembered that the French people were the first city-state, the Parisian community, to throw religion out of their society, and declare an Atheistical State in A.D. 1789-1792. It was the military butcher, the monster Napoleon, who brought the mental sickness of religion back into French society.
Lastly, having seen Professor Dennett several times on C-Span, I intensely like this humane, philosophical mind!
Respectfully,
John E.D.P. Malin,
Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer
Informatica Corporation
Executive Division
P.O. Drawer 460
Cecilia, Louisiana 70521-0460
Contact Information: InformaticaMalin@gmail.com
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
