|
|
|
|
Holistic Guidance - Guess Who's Coming to Dinner (40th Anniversary Edition)
|
List Price: $19.94
Our Price: $18.49
Your Save: $ 1.45 ( 7% )
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Manufacturer: Sony Pictures
Starring: Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier, Katharine Hepburn, Katharine Houghton, Cecil Kellaway
Directed By: Stanley Kramer
|
Average Customer Rating:  
|
|
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Binding: DVD
Brand: Sony
EAN: 0043396211001
Format: AC-3
Label: Sony Pictures
Manufacturer: Sony Pictures
Number Of Items: 2
Publisher: Sony Pictures
Region Code: 99
Release Date: 2008-02-12
Running Time: 107
Studio: Sony Pictures
Theatrical Release Date: 1967-12-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn (who won the Academy Award® for Best Actress for her performance) are unforgettable as perplexed parents in this landmark 1967 movie about mixed marriage. Joanna (Katharine Houghton) the beautiful daughter of crusading publisher Matthew Drayton (Tracy) and his patrician wife Christina (Hepburn) returns home with her new fiance John Prentice (Sidney Poitier) a distinguished black doctor. Christina accepts her daughter's decision to marry John but Matthew is shocked by this interracial union; the doctor's parents are equally dismayed. Both families must sit down face to face and examine each other's level of intolerance. In GUESS WHO'S COMING TO DINNERdirector Stanley Kramer has created a masterful study of society's prejudices.System Requirements:Run Time: 107 Mins.Format: DVD MOVIE Genre: DRAMA Rating: NR UPC: 043396211001 Manufacturer No: 21100
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Thematic still applicable today; great movie
Comment: "Guess Who's Coming To Dinner" is nothing short of fantastic. It is funny, smart, brilliant, thoughtful, and altogether great. The performances by Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier and Katherine Hepburn were phenomenal. I especially liked the performances by Hepburn and Tracy as their characters were confronted by their own unconscious racism and discrimination when they though they were extremely liberal.
This couple raised a daughter, Joanna, to be extremely liberal and to believe in the equality of the races. But, it is still a shock to them when their daughter brings home a black man, Dr. Prentiss, as the man she wants to marry. This family must then confront the schemes and ideas they had of themselves and of their views. The couple, played by Sidney Poitier and Katherine Houghton, must also face the criticism of his parent, who is also against this biracial engagement, and also the housekeeper, a black woman, who also is against them. The movie is brilliant in that it challenges not only the characters, but ourselves, about our so-called liberalism, and it does it in a very funny way. In retrospect, I can only imagine what this movie meant for its time; but, let us not forget what it still does and how the thematic of this film is still applicable to this day.
Customer Rating:
Summary: A Dated Film But Still Worth Watching
Comment: In this 1967 film directed by Stanley Kramer at one point Spencer Tracy (Matthew Drayton) asks Sidney Poitier (John Prentice, M.D.) what will become of their children if he marries their daughter Katharine Drayton (Joanna). He responds that Joanna believes they will become president but he would settle for secretary of state. Her prophecy has already come true in part since the United States has now had two secretarys of state who are African American and a black man now all but has the Democratic nomination for president sewn up. The film is dated and wouldn't make much sense if set in the present. In 1967, however, a movie about an interracial marriage was certainly one that raised eyebrows.
The rather thin plot is saved by the acting of three Academy Award winners, Tracey, Poitier and Hepburn-- she received a best actress award for her performance here-- all of whom give brilliant performances. Although I saw the film in 1967 I still remembered after all these years Tracy's speech near the end of the movie when he informs Poitier that, yes, he does remember what it was like to be madly in love at a young age. Of course the speech is even more poignant in retrospect since this was the last film Hepburn and Tracy ever made together for he died a few days after the film was completed. So when Hepburn's eyes teared up during his comments, we suspect that she wasn't acting at all.
It was not unusual in the 1960's-- or even today for that matter-- for liberals not to always practice what they preached. Tracy plays a newspaper editor in San Francisco known and respected for his liberal views about race. It's the old "not my daughter" or "not in my back yard" syndrome.
Occasionally the film relies on stereotypes-- Tillie, the cook and housekeeper-- for instance; and while it is not Mr. Kramer's best movie, it is certainly worth seeing again. I'd give it an A minus.
Customer Rating: 
Summary: Pretty Good
Comment: Well, I finally sat down and watched this movie. For it's time, I'm sure this was really pushing the envelope. I think it's kind of funny that an interracial couple meet in Hawaii and the white woman believes their children will grow up to be President. (Obama's parent's maybe?) Anyway, the performances were good...except for Katherine Houghton (Hepburn's niece.) I thought that she was too naive by half and listening to her made me cringe.. She was supposed to be 23 but she really acts 16. It didn't come across as mature love at all. Plus, I'd like it if Poitier wasn't a doctor. Why couldn't he have been the mailman or the manual laborer? There we would really be turning up the heat. The timeline seemed contrieved. There really wasn't a reason the couldn't wait 6 months. Truly, for the subject matter, the movie played it safe...and to that end I was a little disappointed, but this is still a movie worth seeing.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Guess Who's Coming to Dinner
Comment: The product arrived in the time specified and was in good condition. I enjoy having a classic on American culture that informs us and invites change.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Mawkish, terribly dated, and borderline embarrassing....
Comment: A problem with message movies such as these is that they tread a fine line between being too much of their time and being universal. While this film caused quite a stir in 1967, watching it today is painful and cringe inducing. It's strictly a product of its time.
The story of an interracial couple (Sidney Poitier and Katherine Houghton) marrying was very radical in 1967, but today it's much more accepted. Things are certainly not perfect, but they are much more tolerant than they were 40 years ago. It is important to note that this film wasn't done for cheap shock value. Stanley Kramer, the director and producer of the film, was a filmmaker who made socially conscious works throughout most of his career, so a film like this was a natural choice for him. Unfortunately, the film is so dated and so obvious that it'll make modern audiences cringe. The screenplay (which won an Oscar!) is trite and never goes beyond a sitcom level. The film plays almost like a "very special" episode of a sitcom. It takes a worthy subject and makes it as inoffensive as oatmeal. It's so blanded down. It's mawkish and overly sentimental as well, which makes it even worse.
It's interesting to contrast this film with a film Poitier made the same year, and that's To Sir, With Love. He plays an American teaching in a tough East End London school. That film, while a bit corny at times, hasn't dated nearly as much as this one, mainly because Poitier's race is only mentioned once, and just for a few seconds (there's a scene where he cut himself, and one of his students foolishly says "oh, he bleeds red"). To Sir, With Love never telegraphs its punches like Guess Who's Coming to Dinner does.
Many of Kramer's films have dated. The films of Otto Preminger, another filmmaker who made socially conscious films, haven't dated at all and are still quite potent in their depiction of politics (his brilliant Advise and Consent), the Israeli/Palestinian conflict (Exodus), and drug addiction (The Man with the Golden Arm). Preminger's work never resorted to maudlin sentimentality (something screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, who wrote Exodus, admired about Otto), and as a result his work is still valid today. While I admire Kramer's sincerity and choice of subject matter, I can't recommend this film. A shame, as it has 3 of the greatest actors to grace the silver screen, and it's Spencer Tracy's last film. All 3 of them are excellent, doing their best to make this pap watchable. It's a pity the film isn't better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
